'A Machine They're Secretly Building'- Prototype Theatre
Prototypes’ ‘A Machine They’re Secretly Building’ is a
sprint through the idea that at all times, we are under surveillance. The
audience walked out of this political performance wanting to throw their phones
away, as facts were hurled at us one after another, teaching us that everything
we do is monitored, every piece of information is kept, and the government
believes this is okay. On 22nd March the company performed the show
at Attenborough Arts Centre, Leicester.
Edward Snowden has observed: “Arguing that you don’t care about the
right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying
that you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.”, and
this was a poignant message throughout the piece, which really gave us as an
audience something to think about.
The
performance had an ironic and playful style, as actors Rachel Baynton
and Gillian Lees ate
secret messages, wrapped each other in cling film, and let balloons free from a
filing cabinet, and they produced some lovely imagery throughout the
performance, particularly with their simple use of pink balaclavas, which I
enjoyed as a symbol. Adam York Gregory’s video presentation provided us with
yet another insight, which reinforced the dialogue, and it became a key figure
in the piece which provided humorous wit, as well as shocking statistics.
Andrew
Westerside’s script maintained an extremely wordy and fact heavy
flow, and although many audience members emerged feeling confused at the scale
of information thrown at them, I enjoyed this overwhelming content, and felt it
made the message of the piece that much more significant. However, I have to
admit, at times the information given came across more suitable for a
university lecture than a performance, so I would have liked the company to
experiment further with their delivery. The vast amount of dialogue was not for everyone, but I did pick up on the way they twisted their information to support their arguments, which was easily missed amongst the bombardment of facts and figures. If considered, their statements my have been
more controversially taken, as they failed to take into account the positive uses of the surveillance discussed.
One thing I have to question, is why, at this level of the
shows development, the actresses still relied on scripts? The use of the
scripts was clearly choreographed, indicating that it was intentional, but it
was unclear for what purpose; perhaps to appear as news readers? All I could
say was that it was distracting and weakened the performance somewhat.
Overall this performance was more interesting than exciting.
It exposed many truths, not only about the government, but about us as humans,
and created an intentionally uncomfortable presence, however the techniques
used were not ground breaking, nor were they any different from the work you
could see from a university student. I cannot lie and say I disliked the piece,
only that I was a little disappointed at the missed opportunities for more
engaging content.
Comments
Post a Comment